Constant Contact -- you really need a .net library for this.  For many of us, OAuth is insanely confusing and seems like a really odd choice for an API that is mostly used for internal tools (like uploading lists to Contact Contact) rather than a user-facing system.  It's great for Facebook but weird and unnecessarily complex for making IT-class apps.  For example, we use .net and we simply want a way to create lists and then bulk-add from CSV files.  Easy, right?  Is it possible to get a .net example, soup to nuts, for something like this where the app we're making an NOT a web app but simply a desktop app (WinForms or even Console is fine).  It needs to clearly show, just using native .net objects, how to authenticate (including getting an activation code) then calling the Create List and then Bulk Upload calls.  This really should be just a few lines of code. ... View more

Thanks Caitlin.  Appreciate you checking and looking forward to the new feature!   Thanks, Steve ... View more

Thanks Caitlin.  I hope you add it.  it's not rocket science (yes, I run a software company) and all the studies I've seen say it helps open rates.  As I asked, precisely what studies do you have to the contrary?   On a related note .. your new Editor is useless for complex tasks and we need to revert to the old one.  One super common thing we do in our emails is to embed the recipient's email address in the purchase links so our system can pre-fill his or her info for returning customers.  This works great by clicking the HTML button on the v2 editor and hand-editing the link.  v3 doesn't have that crucial feature so it's worthless to us.  We cannot use v3 for anything significant.  Also, in v3, it's impossible (or we couldn't figure out how) to get blocks with 1/2 text, 1/2 picture to reverse left  and right. In v2, there are distinct blocks to drag in for each an they work great.  V3, no such luck.     The ONLY reason we even asked to use v3 was simply to get emojis into the subject line.  But w/o the HTML editor, it's worthless to us and we had to quickly re-code our emails using v2.  I hope you consider the v3 editor a beta as it's nowhere near ready for real world use.  Can you please revert our settings to using the old editor until and unless you bring v3 up to feature parity w/ v2?   Thanks, Steve ... View more

I'm rather curious how your data indicates that adding names to subject lines increases spam report since your customers cannot do it so you should have no original data on the topic.  On the contrary, studies by 3rd parties clearly indicate that adding names to subject names increases open rates.  Please cite your study.  Or just let your customers do it - like we can w/ competing services.   Steve ... View more